User Spectrums

Created at Urban Jungle in 2022

Urban Jungle Insurance is an insurtech using technology to challenge an outdated industry. My role was to contribute to building a simple, fair, and affordable product with the best-in-class UX and UI.


Challenge: After spending time and resources building 2 user personas, these were not useful to the product team’s design process or the wider team’s understanding of our users.

Solution: Create a tool and process to help us design customer-first solutions and communicate our users' needs, frustrations and behaviours to the wider team and stakeholders.

not as much

not as much

not as much

Sensitive

Sensitive

Sensitive

Understanding the problem

Industry research:

To understand how and when personas work best, I talked to designers and read blogs from various companies. I noticed that putting a lot of resources into building personas that didn’t work was a very common problem!

I decided to send out a survey to ask other designers about their experience with personas, how useful they've found them and what other tools they use.

80%

Of designers used personas but only half rated them 5/5 usefulness


20%

Of designers had used personas in previous jobs/projects but no longer found them useful


66%

Had reservations against personas as the only tool to understand and represent users


80%

Of designers used personas but only half rated them 5/5 usefulness


20%

Of designers had used personas in previous jobs/projects but no longer found them useful


66%

Had reservations against personas as the only tool to understand and represent users


80%

Of designers used personas but only half rated them 5/5 usefulness


20%

Of designers had used personas in previous jobs/projects but no longer found them useful


66%

Had reservations against personas as the only tool to understand and represent users


Senior designers were the most

skeptical of personas and used alternative tools:

"They aren't inclusive enough and tend to sway me into designing for only one person when it could be so many people using the product I'm designing"

"They aren't inclusive enough and tend to sway me into designing for only one person when it could be so many people using the product I'm designing"

Senior designers were the most

skeptical of personas and used alternative tools:

Senior designers were the most

skeptical of personas and used alternative tools:

"They aren't inclusive enough and tend to sway me into designing for only one person when it could be so many people using the product I'm designing"

Research takeaway

This research highlighted the importance of having unbiased tools and introduced me to alternative tools that could help us understand our users independently from their demographic data.

A tool I found particularly interesting was User Spectrums - this tool not only highlighted needs and pain points but also how these are different for each user types, unlike personas, this tool was built from user behaviour without generalising users.

Seeing Sarah W at Config 2022 (Figma's Product Design Conference) talk about how her team built user spectrums for Canyon inspired me to learn more and ultimately build User Spectrums for Urban Jungle!

Mindset segmentation?

Anti personas?

Anti personas?

Archetypes?

Archetypes?

User spectrums!

Building & Collaborating

Why user spectrums could help

Getting support from stakeholders and team input:


I presented my research to relevant team members and got their input to find the spectrums we could build.

I got stakeholders' support and access to more resources and cross-functional input by explaining how the spectrums could help us make user-centric decisions and allow us to be on the same page when it comes to our user's needs, pain points, and behaviors.

Using an open file that everyone could access and discuss ideas, was key for a truly collaborative process!

Spectrums Lab

Using an open file that everyone could access and discuss ideas, was key for a truly collaborative process!

Spectrums Lab

Finding our Spectrums

Using existing qualitative data

After trying to use quantitative research with the help of our data team, I realised this wasn't enough to find trends in behaviour and link these to needs and pain points. So I turned to the vast qualitative research we had from previous user interview projects. Talking to our customer operations team was super important to validate ideas and find the pain points for the users on the end of the spectrum.

Finalising the UJ Spectrums

Incorporating and introducing the spectrums


After collecting qualitative research and collaborating with members from the product, customer operations and data team I was able to find the needs, pain points and behaviours of each end of all the spectrums. I was now time to think about how we could introduce this new tool to our processes and the wider company.

Here's what I did:


The impact

The spectrums exist. So what?

Since documenting, presenting and introducing the spectrums to our processes we've been able to improve a few things: 

  • Better understanding of our users - we're able to identify and understand our users when researching and interviewing them.

  • User-centric design decisions - the tool helps us push and pull priorities while thinking about the users we want to target.

  • A flexible tool - we can keep feeding research and data back into the spectrums as we go and keep our user's needs, pain points and behaviours up-to-date 

  • Language - everyone can now champion our users and communicate them clearly  with the same terminology

Back to homepage

Lara

Santos

Thanks for having a look!

What next?

Back to homepage

Lara

Santos

Thanks for having a look!

What next?